BOOK A CALL

Complements or Substitutes? A Microfoundations Perspective on the Interplay between Drivers of Ambidexterity in SMEs

Summary for agile leaders

Survey of 88 German SMEs suggests the drivers of ambidexterity for a business unit may not be effective in combination. Structural, contextual, or leadership focus, rather than combinations, work best. Structural and contextual drivers together particularly put people at cross-purposes.

Reviewed: 02 Jan 2023 by Russ Lewis
Request full analysis of this paper 
Authors: 
Alexander Zimmermann, Susan A. Hill, Julian Birkinshaw, Martin Jaeckel
Publication date: 
2020
DOI: 
10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101927

My classifications

Tags: 

Abstract

Research on the microfoundations of ambidexterity has identified a number of drivers that shape the ability of individuals to overcome exploration-exploitation tensions. However, little is known about how these drivers interact and whether they act as complements or substitutes. In a two-stage survey of small and medium-sized enterprises, we find that formal structural drivers and informal contextual drivers of ambidexterity do not demonstrate complementarity, as generally assumed, but rather act at cross-purposes with each other. Furthermore, we find that behaviorally complex executives (those with the ability to think and act ambidextrously) appear to render the effects of the other two drivers relatively unimportant, and are only ever associated with moderate levels of ambidexterity. These findings permit the development of important theoretical insights for ambidexterity research from a microfoundations perspective.

Cite as (Harvard referencing)

Zimmermann, A. et al. (2020) ‘Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs’, Long Range Planning, 53(6), p. 101927
December 31, 2023
Transformation research update

'Managing Tensions not People' as transformation method research update at the end of 2023 This time last year I was searching through the ambidexterity literature for tensions other than the usual explore-exploit. I built a website to publish my progress online, which I think was a diversion! Literature research update I found more than 70 […]

Read More
January 9, 2025
Invitation to use Tensions Management to improve performance (free of charge)

This is an invitation to meet your organisation's objectives and help develop the Tensions Management approach. I need to test and share it so organisations that are struggling can benefit, level-up, thrive and prosper. Collaborators will apply Tensions Management techniques to solve real issues in their organisations as part of a global action learning research […]

Read More
March 26, 2023
12 signs that using 'ambidexterity as an agile transformation model' is not my original idea

You see, I thought I was the first agilist to make the connection between agile transformation models and organizational ambidexterity. Certainly, it seemed original when it emerged in conversation with my supervisor. In fact, it was Dr Alireza Javanmardi Kashan’s idea (better make it 13 signs), but it came from our conversation so we said […]

Read More
1 2 3 15
Copyright Russ Lewis 1994-2025
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram