BOOK A CALL

Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System

Summary for agile leaders

Awaiting annotation

Reviewed: 02 Jan 2023 by Russ Lewis
Request full analysis of this paper 
Authors: 
Paul S. Adler, Barbara Goldoftas, David I. Levine
Publication date: 
1999
DOI: 
10.1287/orsc.10.1.43

My classifications

Abstract

This article seeks to reconceptualize the relationship between flexibility and efficiency. Much organization theory argues that efficiency requires bureaucracy, that bureaucracy impedes flexibility, and that organizations therefore confront a tradeoff between efficiency and flexibility. Some researchers have challenged this line of reasoning, arguing that organizations can shift the efficiency/flexibility tradeoff to attain both superior efficiency and superior flexibility. Others have pointed out numerous obstacles to successfully shifting the tradeoff. Seeking to advance our understanding of these obstacles and how they might be overcome, we analyze an auto assembly plant that appears to be far above average industry performance in both efficiency and flexibility. NUMMI, a Toyota subsidiary located in Fremont, California, relied on a highly bureaucratic organization to achieve its high efficiency. Analyzing two recent major model changes, we find that NUMMI used four mechanisms to support its exceptional flexibility/efficiency combination. First, metaroutines (routines for changing other routines) facilitated the efficient performance of nonroutine tasks. Second, both workers and suppliers contributed to nonroutine tasks while they worked in routine production. Third, routine and nonroutine tasks were separated temporally, and workers switched sequentially between them. Finally, novel forms of organizational partitioning enabled differentiated subunits to work in parallel on routine and nonroutine tasks. NUMMI's success with these four mechanisms depended on several features of the broader organizational context, most notably training, trust, and leadership.

Cite as (Harvard referencing)

Adler, P.S., Goldoftas, B., Levine, D.I., 1999. Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organization Science 10, 43–68
July 7, 2016
Shu Ha Ri: a Chef Metaphor for Agile Learning
Russ Lewis
No Comments

The Shu Ha Ri Agile learning metaphor Agile learning is crucial to agile transformation. And, nobody tells the Shu Ha Ri learning metaphor better than Alistair Cockburn as I discovered listening to his Sushi-slicing version whilst in France last year. As I was in France, I was inspired to write a Chef version of Shu […]

Read More
September 9, 2020
Context is Key
Russ Lewis
No Comments

Every organisation has a particular set of problems created by the thinking system employed by its managers.Humble leaders seek ways to improve themselves and their management teams. By opening themselves to learning and self-discovery, they see the flaws in their systems. This brings understanding, which makes what needs to change quite obvious.This is the normal […]

Read More
February 16, 2020
Managers don’t make difficult decisions
Russ Lewis
No Comments

Contrary to popular belief, managers are not there to ‘make difficult decisions’. What makes a decision difficult usually, is a lack of information. What makes a decision dangerous is the lack of knowledge of how to use that information. If a manager selects one item from a list of choices or approves an initiative instead […]

Read More
1 2 3 … 15
Copyright Russ Lewis 1994-2025
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram