Theory paper examining "processes of experiential learning as instruments of organizational intelligence." It explains the need for (evolution of) departments, as well as the problems of organizational learning. The problematic 'myopia' discussed are:
- sacrificing the long term for the short (short-termism);
- favouring learning that brings results closer to home, very often that are easier to attain (og. improving local exploitation);
- oversampling success (promoting successful individuals and their stories) whilst deselecting failure with its inherent variety, diversity, and potential for valuable innovation.
Personally, I rate this paper over [[@March, 1991]], but then I thought Betamax was a better video format too.
"Even highly capable individuals are confused by the difficulties of ambiguous experience to interpret complex worlds."
Error: Contact form not found.
What a priviledge to be the inaugral guest in Giles Lindsay's latest podcast adventure. We had great fun and it was a real blast! "Welcome to The Agile Confessional, a podcast that shares fun confessions from people who’ve spent a large part of their career working in the agile world. Hear the mistakes they made […]
Development Occurs over Time, not on a Training Course During our many combined years as trainers with Learning Tree International, the average instructor grade exceeded 3.8 of a possible 4.0. Attendees loved the training, and provided fantastic testimonials. But that doesn't mean they used what we taught them, or that they improved because of the […]
Every organisation has a particular set of problems created by the thinking system employed by its managers.Humble leaders seek ways to improve themselves and their management teams. By opening themselves to learning and self-discovery, they see the flaws in their systems. This brings understanding, which makes what needs to change quite obvious.This is the normal […]
